Mortgage Servicing Fraud
occurs post loan origination when mortgage servicers use false statements and book-keeping entries, fabricated assignments, forged signatures and utter counterfeit intangible Notes to take a homeowner's property and equity.
Articles |The FORUM |Law Library |Videos | Fraudsters & Co. |File Complaints |How they STEAL |Search MSFraud |Contact Us
William A. Roper, Jr.
The Washington Post has weighed in with an article which mentions the Silverberg decision, but seems to have been spinned by MERS in respect of some contrary holdings in California:

 

Washington Post: "Courts may reshape mortgage industry", Brady Dennis and Renae Merle (June 14, 2011)

http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/courts-may-reshape-mortgage-industry/2011/06/13/AGhPzHVH_story.html?hpid=z10


I thought the article deserved its own thread.
Quote 0 0
Adam
What California case that sided for MERS is this article referring to?
Quote 0 0
Digger

SUSAN L. FERGUSON et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants,
v.
AVELO MORTGAGE, LLC, Defendant and Respondent.

No. B223447.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Four.

Filed June 1, 2011.

Susan L. Ferguson, in pro. per, and for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

McCarthy & Holthus, James M. Hester, Sasan Mirkarimi; and Melissa Coutts for Defendant and Respondent.


Quote 0 0
Foley
Digger wrote:

SUSAN L. FERGUSON et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants,
v.
AVELO MORTGAGE, LLC, Defendant and Respondent.

No. B223447.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Four.

Filed June 1, 2011.

Susan L. Ferguson, in pro. per, and for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

McCarthy & Holthus, James M. Hester, Sasan Mirkarimi; and Melissa Coutts for Defendant and Respondent.




So MERS is the holder of the note. They even mention that Nebraska ruling in which  people say MERS admits they do not hold the note?
Quote 0 0
Write a reply...