Mortgage Servicing Fraud
occurs post loan origination when mortgage servicers use false statements and book-keeping entries, fabricated assignments, forged signatures and utter counterfeit intangible Notes to take a homeowner's property and equity.
Articles |The FORUM |Law Library |Videos | Fraudsters & Co. |File Complaints |How they STEAL |Search MSFraud |Contact Us
BISHOP
THE SEVENTH AMENDMENT TO THE U.S. CONSTITUTION PROVIDES THAT ONE HAS A RIGHT TO A SUIT AT COMMON LAW, WHICH FRAUD BY THE BANKS CONSTITUTES CLEAR VIOLATION OF COMMON LAW PRINCIPLES.

THE SEVENTH AMENDMENT STATES:

   
"IN SUITS AT COMMON LAW, WHERE THE VALUE IN CONTROVERSY SHALL EXCEEN TWENTY DOLLARS, THE RIGHT TO A TRIAL BY JURY SHALL BE PRESERVED, AND NO FACT TRIED BY A JURY SHALL BE OTHERWISE RE-EXAMINED IN ANY COURT OF THE UNITED STATES, THAN ACCORDING TO THE RULES OF COMMON LAW."

A LEGAL CONTROVERSY FOR BREACH OF CONTRACT IS A COMMON LAW ISSUE.

THE SEVERAL STATE'S ATTORNEY GENERALS ARE ATTEMPTING TO "MUDDY THE WATERS" IN A HAIR BRAINED ATTEMPT TO MAKE AN END RUN AROUND THE CONSTITUTION.

THE FACT IS THAT THERE IS NO IMMUNITY FOR VIOLATING THE CONSTITUTION.

THEIR ATTEMPT TO TURN THE JUDICIAL SYSTEM INTO A STATE LEGISLATURE BY UTILIZING AN ATTORNEY GENERAL (WHICH IS NOT A LEGISLATURE OR A MEMBER OF THE EXECUTIVE BRANCH OF GOVERNMENT) (GENERALLY A STATE'S ATTORNEY GENERAL IS A MEMBER OF THE JUDICIAL BRANCH OF GOVERNMENT THAT IS AN ELECTED POSITION) TO TELL THE LAWYERS IN THEIR RESPECTIVE LEGISLATURES THAT UNLESS THEY PASS LEGISLATION PROVIDING IMMUNITY TO THE BANKS FOR THEIR FRAUDULENT ACTIONS AND BREACH OF CONTRACTS, BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTIES ETC. THAT THE "SYSTEM" WILL BE KAPUT.

IN FACT, THE ALLIANCE BETWEEN LAWYERS (WHICH ARE JUDGES THAT HAVE OPTED OUT OF THE DAY TO DAY LAWYERING ENTREPENEURIAL PHASE OF THEIR CAREERS) AND THE BANKS IS WELL DOCUMENTED IN AN UNLAWFUL ATTEMPT TO USURP THE POWERS OF THE LEGISLATURE AND THE EXECUTIVE BRANCH TO EMPOWER THE JUDICIAL BRANCH TO GRANT AN IMMUNITY FROM THE RIGHT TO EVERY CITIZEN TO ASSERT THEIR RIGHT TO STATE A COUNTER-CLAIM AND HAVE A JURY DECIDE THE RIGHT OF THE WRONGLY FORECLOSED FROM RECOMPENSE FOR THE FRAUD, AND THE MANY BREACHES.

WE CANNOT ALLOW THIS TO HAPPEN. THE SUPREMACY CLAUSE OF THE CONSTITUTION CANNOT BE NULLIFIED BY THE ACTIONS OF THE STATE ATTORNEY GENERALS.

THE ATTORNEY GENERAL'S ATTEMPTS TO USURP THE CONSTITUTION BY PASSING BLANKET IMMUNITY THROUGH LEGISLATION IN THE STATE LEGISLATURES IS CLEARLY ATTEMPTING TO CARVE AN EXCEPTION OUT FOR THE BANKS AND THEIR CO-CONSPIRATORS TO VIOLATE YOUR RIGHTS TO DUE PROCESS OF LAW.

MEANWHILE, EVERY ATTORNEY WHO CANNOT PAY THEIR BILLS IS ATTEMPTING TO GET AN ELECTED POSITION OR BECOME AND APPOINTED JUDGE TO A VACANCY CREATED BY A RETIRING JUDGE.

IN OTHER WORDS, THE LAWYERS ARE PROTECTING THEIR PRIVILEGED CLASS BY EARLY RETIREMENTS AND APPOINTMENTS OF THEIR "FRIENDS" TO POSITITON OF JUDGES, WHICH WILL SECURE THEM TO A STEADY PAYCHECK AS WELL AS A PENSION TO SUPPLEMENT THEIR SOCIAL SECURITY.

PROTEST THE ONGOING UNDERMINING OF OUR RIGHTS TO DUE PROCESS OF LAW GUARANTEED TO US UNDER THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT TO THE U.S. CONSTITUTION AS WELL AS THE FIFTH AMENDMENT TO THE U.S. CONSTITUTION.

LET YOUR LEGISLATOR'S KNOW THAT THE ENACTMENT OF IMMUNITY FOR THE BANKS WILL BE FAR WORSE FOR THE GOOD OF SOCIETY THAN FOR THE SHORT TERM GAIN TO THE BANKS, THE LAWYERS AND THEIR AIDERS AND ABETTERS.
Quote 0 0

Hi All

 

The big banks and there large campaign contributions seem to feel they can violate the Constitution.

 

Problem is  who will hold them ACCOUNTABLE?

 

Best regards

 

Acesfull

Quote 0 0
TheEquitableOne
And the answer is:

The people, or no one.

Quote 0 0
Write a reply...