Mortgage Servicing Fraud
occurs post loan origination when mortgage servicers use false statements and book-keeping entries, fabricated assignments, forged signatures and utter counterfeit intangible Notes to take a homeowner's property and equity.
Articles |The FORUM |Law Library |Videos | Fraudsters & Co. |File Complaints |How they STEAL |Search MSFraud |Contact Us
Ann
From undisclosed source

Barry Fagan v Wells Fargo Re Request for Judicial Notice of a Related Case Michael l. Jones v Wells Fargo Punitive Damage Award of $3,171,154

http://www.scribd.com/doc/88520673/Barry-Fagan-v-Wells-Fargo-Re-Request-for-Judicial-Notice-of-a-Related-Case-Michael-l-Jones-v-Wells-Fargo-Punitive-Damage-Award-of-3-171-154

Comes now Plaintiff Barry S. Fagan herewith serves upon Defendants and their Attorneys of record his Request for Judicial Notice of a Related Case No. 03-16518 DEBTOR SECTION A CHAPTER 13 ADVERSARY NO. 06-1093
MICHAEL L. JONES VS WELLS FARGO HOME MORTGAGE, INC.
DATED APRIL 5, 2012 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA IN RE: MICHAEL L. JONES v WELLS FARGO HOME MORTGAGE. THE COURT FINDS THAT A PUNITIVE DAMAGE AWARD OF $3,171,154.00 MILLION IS WARRANTED TO DETER WELLS FARGO FROM SIMILAR CONDUCT IN THE FUTURE. THE COURT FINDS THAT IT HAS JURISDICTION OVER THIS PROCEEDING FOR CIVIL CONTEMPT.
This is an official act of the UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA BEFORE THE HONORABLE ELIZABETH W. MAGNER in her effort to review the practices of Wells Fargo Bank which ultimately concluded that a punitive damage award of $3,171,154.00 million is warranted to deter Wells Fargo from similar conduct in the future. That Court hopes that the relief granted will finally motivate Wells Fargo to rectify its practices and comply with the terms of court orders. In Plaintiff’s case, Wells Fargo Bank has fraudulently altered recorded documents, robo-signed discovery responses, falsified loan applications, failed to provide loan level accounting, and Plaintiff has supported all of its allegations with multiple expert opinions. (Attached hereto and made a part hereof as Exhibit A)
The issues and findings are intimately related to the case at bar and is authorized under California Evidence Code § 452.

Quote 0 0
Write a reply...