Mortgage Servicing Fraud
occurs post loan origination when mortgage servicers use false statements and book-keeping entries, fabricated assignments, forged signatures and utter counterfeit intangible Notes to take a homeowner's property and equity.
Articles |The FORUM |Law Library |Videos | Fraudsters & Co. |File Complaints |How they STEAL |Search MSFraud |Contact Us
A Pro Se plaintiff stood tall in Maricopa County Superior Court last Friday and proceeded to kicks the butt of Deutsche Bank and their wermacht co-conspirators.

Here is the link to the minute entry - posted a few minutes ago:

http://www.courtminutes.maricopa.gov/docs/Civil/052011/m4715498.pdf

THIS Judge GETS IT..................

SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2010-099949 05/06/2011
Docket Code 019 Form V000A Page 1
CLERK OF THE COURT
HONORABLE KAREN POTTS M. Scott
Deputy
ROBERT SANDOVAL SR. ROBERT SANDOVAL SR.
774 W GOLDFINCH WAY
CHANDLER AZ 85286-4454
v.
DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST
COMPANY, et al.
DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST
COMPANY
NO ADDRESS ON RECORD
INDY MAC BANK F S B
NO ADDRESS ON RECORD
KEVIN HAHN
MILA INC
NO ADDRESS ON RECORD
PAUL M LEVINE
LAKSHMI JAGANNATH
MINUTE ENTRY
1:57 p.m. This is the time set for Oral Argument Re: Defendant Quality Loan Service
Corporation’s Motion to Dismiss or in the alternative Motion for Summary Judgment in this
matter. Plaintiff(s) Robert and Marsha Sandoval, are present on their own behalf. Defendant
Quality Loan Service Corporation is represented by Lakshmi Jagannath.
A record of the proceedings is made by audio and/or videotape in lieu of a court reporter.
Ms. Jagannath presents argument. Mr. Sandoval is heard in response. Ms. Jagannath is
heard in closing.
2:24 p.m. Matter concludes.

SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CV 2010-099949 05/06/2011
Docket Code 019 Form V000A Page 2
LATER:
Defendant Quality Loan Service Corp. (“Quality”) has filed a Motion to Dismiss, or in
the alternative, a Motion for Summary Judgment arguing that Counts 1-6 do not state a claim for
relief against it, as trustee. In support, Defendant Quality has attached a recorded Substitution of
Trustee. The Court is puzzled by this document because it is signed by an officer of Defendant
Quality, as agent for One West Bank, FSB yet (1) there is no evidence of such an agency, (2)
there is no evidence linking One West Bank, FSB to MILA, Inc., the entity from which Plaintiff
obtained the original loan, and (3) the Plaintiff has alleged a break in the chain of title regarding
the loan and Defendant Quality as Trustee, which the Court must accept as true. Thus, while
A.R.S. §33-807(E) may operate to dismiss a trustee in certain instances, if one of the allegations
of a complaint is that the entity purporting to act as trustee has not been legally appointed as
trustee, this statute would not come into play. Taking the allegations of the Complaint as true,
causes of actions have been alleged by Plaintiff against Defendant Quality in Count 2 (alleging
that Defendant Quality was not appointed as trustee by an entity in the chain of title to the
underlying note/deed of trust), Count 3 (alleging that the document appointing Defendant
Quality as trustee is false or forged), and Count 5 (allege fraud in the appointment of Defendant
Quality as trustee), and Count 6 (alleging statutory and contractual violations in Defendant
Quality’s notice of the trustee sale). The Court finds that there are no allegations against
Defendant Quality stated in Counts 1 or 4. Therefore,
IT IS ORDERED granting Defendant Quality Loan Service Corp.’s Motion to Dismiss
as to Counts 1 and 4 only, with prejudice, and denying the Motion as to Counts 2, 3, 5, and 6.
/ s / HONORABLE KAREN POTTS
JUDICIAL OFFICER OF THE SUPERIOR COURT
ALERT: eFiling through AZTurboCourt.gov is mandatory in civil cases for attorneyfiled
documents effective May 1, 2011. See Arizona Supreme Court Administrative Orders
2010-117 and 2011-010. The Court may impose sanctions against counsel to ensure compliance
with this requirement after May 1, 2011.



Quote 0 0
Write a reply...