Mortgage Servicing Fraud
occurs post loan origination when mortgage servicers use false statements and book-keeping entries, fabricated assignments, forged signatures and utter counterfeit intangible Notes to take a homeowner's property and equity.
Articles |The FORUM |Law Library |Videos | Fraudsters & Co. |File Complaints |How they STEAL |Search MSFraud |Contact Us
Using newly created interruption of FCR, Lawyers representing lenders are being sued for Civil Rights Action.
In Wisconsin, GRAY&ASSOCIATES from Milwaukee,(Litton Loan Lawyers) are being sued in Federal Court, The case recently filed is sure to be followed by more litigation from victims of mortgage fraud, an number of additional cases are anticipated in being filed from Wisconsin Victims.
We will be following this case, along with many more in other states currently filed, and report on the outcome.
Quote 0 0
Sorry meant to tell you they are using, Title 18 Part 1, Chapter 241, It has to do with then two or more individuals CONSPIRE AGAINST YOUR RIGHTS.
Lawyers used by companies like Litton Loan are most likely going to find themselves under the gun from this statue.
Quote 0 0

very interesting reading, a problem for Collection Lawyers!
Quote 0 0
O -

'victory' declared, credit is claimed
Modesto Bee - Nov 23, 2007
"the governor's principles already are in alignment with what we already do," said larry b. litton jr., who heads litton loan servicing. "nothing's substantially changed." but that's not what schwarzenegger and his staff are telling the public. the ...

Quote 0 0
From the MSF Legal Lounge:

TITLE 18 > PART I > CHAPTER 13 > § 241
Prev | Next

§ 241. Conspiracy against rights

If two or more persons conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or because of his having so exercised the same; or
If two or more persons go in disguise on the highway, or on the premises of another, with intent to prevent or hinder his free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege so secured—
They shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, they shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.
Quote 0 0
Senior Partner, GRAY, resigned from the Wisconsin Bar on October 30, 2007.  No further information is available.
Gray & End, then Gray & Associates, represents Litton Loan and numerous others in Foreclosure's, Lawyers J. Pitney and Mike Riley remain, Complaints and pending litigation against both them and the firm was filed in Federal Court this month for Civil Rights violations.
This was the firm that foreclosed on me twice, without cause, and was prepaid to foreclose on me nearly 6 months ahead of time by Litton Loan! 
My case in continuing, with a contract tort action, that includes "Punitive" for "intentional wrongful acts" (Fraud).
Numerous other Litton Loan Law firms and lawyers have been identified and may face similar complaints in the near future, as large Plaintiff Law firms are researching a number of actions involving Litton Lawyers.
Quote 0 0

This is good.  All lenders are guilty of this.

Quote 0 0
18 U.S.C. 241 is the statute that establishes the U.S. Department of Justices jurisdiction to go after those individuals that, as a result of their investigation, have conspired to deprive persons of their rights. Those rights are inclusive of any right established by the constitution or by statute.

The Justice Department has had the standing to pursue these individuals since this statute was enacted. No class of individual is entitled to immunity for depriving one of one's rights under the constitution. That includes judges. Judges are not simply rendering wrong the U.C.C. clearly establishes procedures, and regulations that the judges MUST FOLLOW. A judge's duty to follow the law established by the legislature, Congress or rights enjoyed under the Constitution is is not discretionary as many judges seem to want to think.

It is time to re-establish the rule of law in the only venue that people enjoy a right to defend their home, life, liberty or any of their a court of law. If, as a defendant in a fraudulent foreclosure, you are deprived of your right to the relief of having the complaint dismissed due to the plaintiff's lack of standing or capacity to have commenced the action, then the judge is a co-conspirator in league with the plaintiff that either does not own the note (ala Judge Boyko's ruling) (or MERS' lack of standing/capacity) or has not given anything of value to the debtor in order to enjoy constitutional standing in a court of law for the alleged and fraudulent default.

It should only require a prosecution of one of the untold hundreds of judges nationwide that abrogate their duty to uphold the law as it is written providing the relief that the debtor is entitled to.

The Justice Department is headed up by a former Federal Judge. Judge Mukasey and his number two right hand man, former Federal Judge Filip are unlikely to go after any judge whether the judge's action violates this provision of law or not. However, their duties are not discretionary, their duties are ministerial. The Justice Department is part of the Executive Branch of government. Its time for President Bush to sign an executive order instructing the Department of Justice to bring several prosecutions of judges under this statute.

There is only one way to clean up the court room mess created by judges willing to do the bidding of the banks. The U.S. Department of Justice must garner the courage to prosecute judges failing to perform their ministerial duty to uphold the rights of the defendant pursuant to statute or constitutional right for having rendered decisions that protected the fraudulent bank or servicer. The judges are nothing more than criminal co-conspirators that have either fabricated a default by means of predatory servicing, or other fraudulent means.
Quote 0 0

Least not, forget the lawyers, and law firms, that fail to do the Due Diligence prior to filing a foreclosure, and their communications with their clients!  Both can be named under this statue, and are responsible.

Quote 0 0
Write a reply...