Mortgage Servicing Fraud
occurs post loan origination when mortgage servicers use false statements and book-keeping entries, fabricated assignments, forged signatures and utter counterfeit intangible Notes to take a homeowner's property and equity.
Articles |The FORUM |Law Library |Videos | Fraudsters & Co. |File Complaints |How they STEAL |Search MSFraud |Contact Us
William A. Roper, Jr.
In several prior threads, I have featured Wisconsin appellate decisions which have clarified the evidentiary requisites necessary to support a summary judgment (or trial) decision.  The Forum is becoming a little cluttered with all of the recent evidentiary decisions, and I thought it might prove helpful to collect some of the by state.  This thread is dedicated to Wisconsin evidentiary decisions.  Hopefully, this will prove helpful to those from the Dairy State!

The key recent evidentiary decisions out of Wisconsin in foreclosure cases are shown in these threads:

Wisconsin Appellate Court Reverse a Summary Judgment Due To Evidentiary Defects in Affidavits (Bank of New York v. Cano)

http://ssgoldstar.websitetoolbox.com/post?id=5074049

 

Wisconsin Appellate Decision for Defendant on Evidentiary Issues: Aurora Loan Services v Carlsen

http://ssgoldstar.websitetoolbox.com/post?id=5155064

 

Another Key Wisconsin Appellate Decision Decided on Evidentiary Issues: PHH Mortg. Corp. v. Kolodziej

http://ssgoldstar.websitetoolbox.com/post?id=5166968


I will endeavor to find and post other earlier decisions as time allows.  If you are aware of a useful Wisconsin evidentiary decisions, even discussed in another thread, please post a link or other identifier her!

Comments, analysis or insights are solicited and appreciated!
Quote 0 0
Write a reply...