Mortgage Servicing Fraud
occurs post loan origination when mortgage servicers use false statements and book-keeping entries, fabricated assignments, forged signatures and utter counterfeit intangible Notes to take a homeowner's property and equity.
Articles |The FORUM |Law Library |Videos | Fraudsters & Co. |File Complaints |How they STEAL |Search MSFraud |Contact Us
Federal Judge Thomas M. ROSE, of Ohio's Southern District, has had a disproportionately large number of his mortgage foreclosure dismissals REPORTED in Lexis-Nexis.  These dismissals include:
  • Deutsche Bank Nat'l Trust Co. v. Steele, Case No. 2:07-cv-886, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO, EASTERN DIVISION, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4937, January 8, 2008, Filed.
  • Midfirst Bank v. Davenport, Case No. 3:07-CV-405, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO, WESTERN DIVISION, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 87741, November 29, 2007, Decided, November 29, 2007, Filed.
  • In re Foreclosure Cases, Case Nos. 07-cv-166, 07-cv-190, 07-cv-226, 07-cv-279, 07-cv-423, 07-cv-534, 07-cv-536, 07-cv-642, 07-cv-670, 07-cv-706, 07-cv-714, 07-cv-727, 07-cv-731, 07-cv-963, 07-cv-999, 07-cv-1047, 07-cv-1091, 07-cv-1119, 07-cv-1150, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO, EASTERN DIVISION, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 90812, November 27, 2007, Decided, November 27, 2007, Filed, Dismissed without prejudice by In re Foreclosure Cases, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 95673 (S.D. Ohio, Dec. 27, 2007).
  • HSBC Bank United States v. Rayford, Case No. 3:07-CV-428, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO, WESTERN DIVISION, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 86215, November 21, 2007, Decided, November 21, 2007, Filed.
  • NovaStar Mortg. v. Grooms, Case No. 3:07-CV-395, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO, WESTERN DIVISION, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 86214, November 21, 2007, Decided, November 21, 2007, Filed.
  • NovaStar Mortg., Inc. v. Riley, Case No. 3:07-CV-397, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO, WESTERN DIVISION, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 86216, November 21, 2007, Decided, November 21, 2007, Filed.
  • In re Foreclosure Cases, CASE NO. 3:07CV043, 07CV049, 07CV085, 07CV138, 07CV237, 07CV240, 07CV246, 07CV248, 07CV257, 07CV286, 07CV304, 07CV312, 07CV317, 07CV343, 07CV353, 07CV360, 07CV386, 07CV389, 07CV390, 07CV433, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO, WESTERN DIVISION, 521 F. Supp. 2d 650; 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 84569, November 15, 2007, Decided, November 15, 2007, Filed.
I previously noted several of these decisions in my post "Federal Judge John D. HOLSCHUH Dismisses an Additional Fourteen Ohio Mortgage Foreclosures" (William A. Roper, Jr.) [12/29/07 at 05:55 PM] at http://www.websitetoolbox.com/tool/post/ssgoldstar/vpost?id=2387806 .  I am uncertain how I mixed these cases in with information posted regarding Judge HOLSCHUH's decisions, but it seemed to me the Judge Thomas ROSE deserved a dedicated discussion thread.

Other unpublished decisions are also noted within other posts (see also my discussion thread "Clearing the Ohio Federal Court Dockets of Foreclosures" [01/07/08 at 05:35 AM].
Quote 0 0
Write a reply...