Mortgage Servicing Fraud
occurs post loan origination when mortgage servicers use false statements and book-keeping entries, fabricated assignments, forged signatures and utter counterfeit intangible Notes to take a homeowner's property and equity.
Articles |The FORUM |Law Library |Videos | Fraudsters & Co. |File Complaints |How they STEAL |Search MSFraud |Contact Us
John
M. Soliman is famus expret witnes avale for foreclose case. Here is an ex-ample affidavit of M. Soliman who is avalible to except your maxamum retaner:

=====

I have been engage foreclosure cases as an expert witness and person of interest to the court for 10 years. Please see my CV and work related experience which is substantially related to non-agency closed whole loan “flow” and “bulk” origination’s and sales. My track record includes sub servicing and warehouse lending on a timeline that extends from 1985 through prescient.

My expensive experiments include as President and Director Compliance Audits for Nationwide Loan Services, a firm specialize in taking borrower involve in foreclose. Five years with various law firms (counsel for Gareeb Pham Los Angeles) on staff. Personal involve in work with attorney for those who implicate in K-Platinum Group fraud (Woodland Hills, CA). Actively work to rehabilitate accuse Brenda Michelson by declaring her expert at NLS. I was Director and CFO for Mortgage Guarantee, a specialist in conversion of mortgage funds. Here I learn the impotence of the capital markets and economics where securities are trade. I was a person of interest to authority in investigation of Pinnfund USA swindle called to testify (August 2, 2004) before the grand jury about activity of those reprehensible. I gave written affidavit about the Tri-Star USA swindle, a major mortgage fraud helping to bring about justification and evasion by those not convict.

During this time I was continually involve in the subprime market and always viewed as an outspoken critic against predatory lending when this was popular. The need to protect the consumer is a requirement to protect the tax payer and which I uniform oppose. For the court to allow the current madness of sanctioning predatory lending by manipulating the short-term debt commercial paper markets is puzzling. I am concern it sends the wrong message to future generation of business and graduate school student looking to enter the busines world soon.

I am a proficient underwaiter and I can affirm having purchased and sold over one billion as a principal. My pooling and servicing trading experiments is elusive to non agency private label mortgage products. I have purchased and sold to all the major name participants (accept those with whom I did not due busines) and there trust in me is show by record and court order. This type of background is offered for testifying in cases with emphasis on general secondary and capital markets trading vehicles.

Therefore I represented myself and this testimony that I offer the honorable court for purposes of qualifying to testify the above entitled matter.

In this type of attorney client engagement made prior or subsequent to the engaging the matter, I offer my unbased opinions expressed from personal firsthand experiments or from what I learn that client need to win case.

The aggregator originates closed whole loans under a purchase and sale agreement with a commercial bank such as CitiBank N.A. My work aggregating loans under these pooling and servicing arrangements is covered in the attached CV that details my 10 years with FDIC thrift and subprime mortgage REITS specialize at fraud as well as working as a principal for whole loan aggregator’s et cetra.

My experiments includes an accounting background and five years working as a CFO for a leading market maker and seller. This experiments is critical in the analysis of the matter from a basis in assets held perspective. In these endeavors I delivered to the same customers who purchased closed whole loan assets for conversion into securities under the same capital markets platform that exist today. Our firm specialied in conversion as is proven in famus court record.

I have testified in a variety of case all related to mortgage lending and for the most, part I have testified for the plaintiffs in wrongful foreclosure claims. Cases I have testified in include the Graupner v Select Portfolio Services and successor Wells Fargo Bank N.A. case that was heard in the California Superior Court and later brought before the Justices for California Appellate Court where I was deposed for two days. In the Graupner matter the Court of Appeals decide to remand the case back to the trial court. Please see the attached listing of cases I was engaged to testify in or advised to retained counsel of the devisees and instrumentalities used by the lender and collaborate to foreclose.

I will submit my personal and professional reference that account for my first hand knowledge gained from experiments as a trade professional in the role of a tax payer corporation and acting chief operating officer or while a principal partner for two different REITS . Hence, the court is asked to consider the expert’s testimony as if from a perspective of a qualified person whose participation in these endeavors , education and training form the basis for a voluble professional opine. In it, I have peppered my analysis based on the facts in this matter as well as having taken a macro view towards the US baking sector as a whole.

Soliman is considered an industry export whose predication of the coming sub prime markets collapse in 2002 was lacking only in timing and accuracy for the devastating affect the sectors participants would cause the US economy!

Therefore the submission of my affidavit is for purposes of serving the court testimony, including all professional and personal opinions, views and firsthand account of instances and related events and so on. The representations and acknowledgements are alleged as fact while asserted “solely” as a lay person and without any responsiblity whatsoever.

My analysis and finding, perspectives and conclusions are prepared to undress the controversies in the mortgage lending sector. This analysis principally undresses controversy surrounding the matter herein the above entitled matter while offering substantive conclusions need to form a valid opine. Every effort is used to remain unbased in undressing merit for arguments brought in claims or otherwise demonstrate the lack of support therein. It is all for purposes of addressing convoluted and abstract subject matter that is deep into Generally Accepted Accounting Rules which can only be understudied by expert. Testimony by accounting rules is designed to build the court confidence in the abundant hearsay that make it into cout and far to many foreclosure case. Also for reporting by tax payers under the Internal Revenue Service , for “IRC” provisions for reporting earnings by the tax payer, corporation and affiliated entities including the known formation of a Taxable REIT Subsidiary, other subsidiaries and parties held to collaborate to create a mortgage secondary market.

respectfully

M.Soliman
registerclaims@live.com

P.S. -- References include Ms. Brenda Michelson and Mr. Stephen Karlton Kop, Esq.

http://www.scribd.com/doc/84518971/M-Soliman-Professional-CV
Quote 0 0
Texas
Danger Will Robinson Danger Evil Atolls
Quote 0 0
Chris
You really have to wonder about a guy who is trying to drum up business using the strategy that he is getting immunity from prosecutors one month and then a few months later is peddling his expertise:

M. Soliman To Get Full Immunity, Testify Against Attorneys and Swindlers
http://ssgoldstar.websitetoolbox.com/post/M.-Soliman-To-Get-Full-Immunity-Testify-Against-Attorneys-and-Swindlers-5952138

If you have any trouble identifying the various spelling and grammatical errors in Maher Soliman's affidavit, take the document to a junior high school English teacher and ask her to grade it for you. This guy is a complete idiot!

There are so many ways to impeach Mr. Soliman's affidavit that it would make me late for work to try. Let me quickly point out a couple near the end and leave the rest for others.

Quote:
M.Soliman
registerclaims@live.com

P.S. -- References include Ms. Brenda Michelson and Mr. Stephen Karlton Kop, Esq.


Maher Soliman seems to have changed e-mail addresses, after using another different e-mail account for several years (old address was expert.witness@live.com). My suspicion is that the old address is totally tagged by mentions in links exposing this scam artist. There is really nothing wrong with changing your e-mail address, but try Googling the old e-mail address to see the kind of documents that turn up in a search.

Maybe the most remarkable thing is the people Maher Soliman chooses as references:

Ms. Brenda Michelson
Mr. Stephen Karlton Kop, Esq.


The first is a former partner of his in the Nationwide Loan Services scam who is currently under Federal indictment in the K-Platinum swindle:

http://www.la.bbb.org/business-reviews/Foreclosure-Consultants/Nationwide-Loan-Services-in-Los-Angeles-CA-100072153

http://www.scribd.com/doc/92772841/USA-v-Coleman-Et-Al-Doc-001-Indictment-08-Dec-2011

The latter is an attorney who has been suspended from the practice of law in California for multiple disciplinary and ethical problems:

http://members.calbar.ca.gov/fal/Member/Detail/91354

There used to be a very informative thread here at the Forum about this swindler, but it seems to have been removed by the site administrator, probably as a professional courtesy for the kinds of swindlers who support and inhabit this site. Be sure to save this post, since the site administrator will probably delete it, too, now that senior have begun yet again to expose this scam artist!
Quote 0 0
Chris
Oh, also note the introductory sentence:

Quote:
I have been engage foreclosure cases as an expert witness and person of interest to the court for 10 years.


Maher Soliman is a person of interest to law enforcement and the courts because of his involvement in prior swindles. Read his affidavit and look at his resume very carefully. Note that three of his prior work experiences (which he calls "experiments") are with K-Platinum Group, Tri-Star and PinnFund USA. Each was a major West Coast swindle that involved mortgages. PinnFund was the largest swindle in U.S. history prior to the exposure of the Madoff swindle. The lead perpetrators in the K-Platinum Group swindle are currently under indictment.

Mr. Maher Soliman seems to be claiming that he escaped prosecution by testifying against the others involved, including the woman he uses as a reference at the conclusion of his affidavit. Whats up with that?

Do you want to trust this idiot with any of your money based upon his assertion that he is turning over a new leaf? One must necessarily concede that he is an expert at swindling!
Quote 0 0
Danny
M. Soliman alway win free house for borrowr. Alway!!

Here is famus case of $1 million house for free:

Case Number Ps08-2028
Matter: La Salle Bank Vs Spicer
Trial: Unlawful Detainer
Won Home at $1million
Court: Superior Court Of Contra Costa
Commissioner: Lowell Richards


Here is pruf:

https://sites.google.com/site/borrowerclaims/Home/foreclosureaccounting
Quote 0 0
$&?!
Quote:
M. Soliman alway win free house for borrowr. Alway!!

Here is famus case of $1 million house for free:

Case Number Ps08-2028
Matter: La Salle Bank Vs Spicer
Trial: Unlawful Detainer
Won Home at $1million
Court: Superior Court Of Contra Costa
Commissioner: Lowell Richards


Here is pruf:

https://sites.google.com/site/borrowerclaims/Home/foreclosureaccounting


This is merely one of many specious claims made by Maher Soliman.  Compare the claims made in his posted Expert Witness Disclosure with the claims made at his Blog Site:


At page 6 of Maher's Expert Witness Disclosure (filed 18 May 2011) he claims to that SPICER obtained a settlement of $500,000.  It had grown to $1 million when he posted the information online.

Actually both claims are false and misleading.  As with most of the cases cited by Maher Soliman, he omits details and then alters facts to create the impression that his testimony or expert witness services afforded some benefit to the borrower.

He tells us this case is:

"SPICER VS. FIRST FRANKLIN FINANCIAL GROUP FFC ET AL
Trial:  Contra County Superior Court; California, Settlement $500,000 Awarded

The plaintiff in the case is actually LaSalle Bank, N.A., rather than First Franklin:

LaSalle Bank, N. A. v. Donal L. SPICER, No. PS08-2028 (Filed 10 Sep 2008; Contra County Superior Court)

Disposition:  Judgment for Plaintiff on 10 Apr 2009; Defendant Ejected from Home and LaSalle Bank Granted Possession.

See:  http://icms.cc-courts.org/tellme/

SPICER actually didn't WIN.  SPICER LOST the case.  LaSalle Bank, N.A., was awarded possession of the property.

This is a slightly different outcome than represented by Maher Soliman and his shills!

Quote 0 0
$&?!

Maher also explains his experience at Mortgage Guarantee Collateral Acceptance:

Quote:
I was Director and CFO for Mortgage Guarantee, a specialist in conversion of mortgage funds.


While Maher's claims regarding SPICER seem to be untrue, his claim that he worked for Mortgage Guarantee, a specialist in conversion of mortgage funds, seems to be true!

It seems most likely that Maher is describing "conversion" in the legal sense of the word as in the tort of conversion.  Here is how John Bouvier describes "conversion":

Quote:
CONVERSION. torts. the unlawful turning or applying the personal goods of another to the use of the taker, or of some other person than the, owner; or the unlawful destroying or altering their nature. Bull. N. P. 44; 6 Mass. 20; 14 Pick. 356; 3 Brod. & Bing. 2; Cro. Eliz. 219 12 Mod. 519; 5 Mass. 104; 6 Shepl. 382; Story, Bailm. 188, 269, 306; 6 Mass. 422; 2 B. & P. 488; 3 B. & Ald. 702; 11 M. & W. 363; 8 Taunt. 237; 4 Taunt. 24.

2. When a party takes away or wrongfully assumes the right to goods which belong to another, it will in general be sufficient evidence of a conversion but when the original taking was, lawful, as when the party found the goods, and the detention only is illegal, it is absolutely necessary to male a demand of the goods, and there must be a refusal to deliver them before the conversion will, be complete. 1 Ch. Pr. 566; 2 Saund. 47 e, note 1 Ch. Pl. 179; Bac. Ab. Trover, B 1 Com. Dig. 439; 3 Com. Dig. 142; 1 Vin. Ab. 236; Yelv. 174, n.; 2 East, R. 405; 6 East, R. 540; 4 Taunt. 799 5 Barn. & Cr. 146; S. C. 11 Eng. C. L. Rep. 185; 3 Bl. Com. 152; 3 Bouv. Inst. n. 3522, et seq. The refusal by a servant todeliver the goods entrusted to him by his master, is not evidence of a conversion by his master. 5 Hill, 455.

3. The tortious taking of property is, of itself, a conversion 15 John. R. 431 and any intermeddling with it, or any exercise of dominion over it, subversive of the dominion of the owner, or the nature of the bailment, if it be bailed, is, evidence of a conversion. 1 Nott & McCord, R. 592; 2 Mass. R. 398; 1 Har. & John. 519; 7 John. R. 254; 10 John. R. 172 14 John. R. 128; Cro. Eliz. 219; 2 John. Cas. 411. Vide Trover.

See:  http://www.constitution.org/bouv/bouvier_c.htm 


Here is some proof that Maher Soliman and Mortgage Guarantee Collateral Acceptance might have been engaged in conversion of mortgage funds:

http://www.scribd.com/doc/86932773/CitiCapital-Commercial-Corp-v-Mortgage-Guarantee-Collateral-Acceptance-Final-Order-10-Feb-2004

http://www.scribd.com/doc/87125429/GMAC-Residential-v-Mortgage-Guarantee-Collateral-Acceptance-Doc-020-Final-Order-15-Mar-2004

Assertion that Maher might have expertise in fraud also seems likely to be true.  However, the fraud of which he seems to be best familiar is that of defrauding banks rather than of banks defrauding borrowers.

Quote 0 0
$&?!
In regards to the false claims about the disposition of the Spicer case, it should be noted that Maher Soliman has continued to make fraudulent representations about the disposition of this case, despite having been called on his false representations in 2009.

Take a look at the posts discussing Soliman's Spicer claims within this thread at Neil Garfield's Living Lies site:

http://livinglies.wordpress.com/emergency-workshop-in-santa-monica-94/


Note these posts in that thread:


MSoliman, on September 26, 2009 at 3:53 pm

MSoliman, on September 29, 2009 at 4:48 pm

M.Soliman, on October 30, 2009 at 11:17 am

M.Soliman, on November 7, 2009 at 5:54 pm

ALLAN, CONFUSED in MA (Sharing the same puzzlement as Deontos, Mortgage Auditor, et al.), on November 8, 2009 at 9:56 pm 

ALLAN in MA & FL (WITH A CONTRA COSTA COUNTY UPDATE ON U.D. CASE PS08-2028), on November 10, 2009 at 11:22 pm

MSoliman, on November 12, 2009 at 2:44 am


Realize that Neil Garfield likes to have fraudulent posts like those of Maher Soliman claiming that someone got a free $1 million house.  This supports the central myth of Garfield's own scam.  I am only surprised that Garfield didn't delete the other expository posts showing that Maher was making false claims, though he probably left these up for his own protection (deletion of the posts could expose Garfield to liability for Soliman's frauds)!

It appears that Mr. Soliman has misrepresented the outcome of Spicer within his CV, as well as within affidavits and declarations filed in other state and Federal matters.  Anyone who brings someone like this into their own case will see their own case implode as soon as Maher Soliman is deposed.  Any attorney who introduces Maher Soliman's perjured testimony into a case could face sanctions and disciplinary action!
Quote 0 0
Leslie
Quote:
Soliman is considered an industry export whose predication of the coming sub prime markets collapse in 2002 was lacking only in timing and accuracy for the devastating affect the sectors participants would cause the US economy!

I especially liked this claim! Read it very carefully! This guy is nuts.
Quote 0 0
Sheik
Here is moor proof of wat John say in No. 1 post top:

http://forechem.blogspot.com/2012/11/program-description-expert-witness.html

Is from incredible web site of M. Soliman hisself!!!
Quote 0 0
Alan
Quote:
Is from incredible web site of M. Soliman hisself!!!

Any website or posts by scam artist Maher Soliman can be correctly described as "incredible" as in the meaning of this word: NOT credible. Almost nothing this swindler says is true. He sprinkles in just enough plausible information to give his posts some possibility of being true -- if you are a complete idiot.

Anyone who pays this man, through his succession of sham entities, fronts, aliases or confederates, whether for loan modification, debt elimination or unauthorized legal services deserves to lose their money. Anyone and everyone who is a victim of Maher Soliman has a duty to his fellow citizen to make a criminal report of his or her victimization so that this criminal can be charged, arrested, convicted and brought to justice.
Quote 0 0
poe
None of it is even remotely plausible. sorry. It is barely rising above intelligible. 
Quote 0 0
tw
Quote:
Alan said:
He sprinkles in just enough plausible information to give his posts some possibility of being true -- if you are a complete idiot.


Quote:
poe said
None of it is even remotely plausible. sorry. It is barely rising above intelligible.


poe is not a complete idiot!

Quote:
Sheik said:
Here is moor proof of wat John say in No. 1 post top:

http://forechem.blogspot.com/2012/11/program-description-expert-witness.html

Is from incredible web site of M. Soliman hisself!!!

Sheik is a complete idiot!
Quote 0 0
goi
SOMEBODY please tell us WHERE this guy is located...!!! We want to tell the DA for the arrest warrant...!!!
goi group
Quote 0 0
Write a reply...