Mortgage Servicing Fraud
occurs post loan origination when mortgage servicers use false statements and book-keeping entries, fabricated assignments, forged signatures and utter counterfeit intangible Notes to take a homeowner's property and equity.
Articles |The FORUM |Law Library |Videos | Fraudsters & Co. |File Complaints |How they STEAL |Search MSFraud |Contact Us
William A. Roper, Jr.
In Deutsche Bank Nat'l Trust Co. v. Wilson, an unpublished decision of the Superior Court of New Jersey Appellate Division handed down on January 19, 2011, the court reversed and remanded a summary judgment granted on the basis of an improper authentication of business records including the forged assignment executed by Laura HESCOTT a robo-forger working within the employ of Lender Processing Services' predecessor Fidelity National Foreclosure Solutions.

The case is:
Deutsche Bank Nat'l Trust Co. v. Wilson, DOCKET NO. A-1384-09T1, SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY, APPELLATE DIVISION, 2011 N.J. Super. Unpub. LEXIS 122, November 3, 2010, Submitted, January 19, 2011, Decided,  NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION. PLEASE CONSULT NEW JERSEY RULE 1:36-3 FOR CITATION OF UNPUBLISHED OPINIONS.
http://www.judiciary.state.nj.us/opinions/a1384-09.pdf
Laura HESCOTT is a particularly notorious robo-forger and robo-perjurer whose activities have been noted in other previous judicial decisions in other jurisdictions.  Her robo-perjury and robo-forgery is expected to be a central consideration in another forthcoming appellate decision in another jurisdiction within the next several months.

*

I would call the particular language of the decision relating to the evidentiary issues to the attention of Forum participants and encourage all to compare with my suggested arguments relating to hearsay and the best evidence rule!

Quote 0 0
William A. Roper, Jr.
See my prior MS Fraud post:

Personal Knowledge, Hearsay, Conclusory Averments and the Best Evidence Rule (9/27/10 at 01:12 AM)
http://ssgoldstar.websitetoolbox.com/post?id=4903945



Quote 0 0
William A. Roper, Jr.
Another significant NY case involving LPS robo-perjurer Laura HESCOTT, IndyMac Bank, FSB v Bethley, was described with in a prior post:
Justice Arthur M. Schack: IndyMac Bank, FSB v Bethley, 2009 NY Slip Op 50186(U) [06 Feb 2009]
http://ssgoldstar.websitetoolbox.com/post?id=3290371
Bethley is a pretty good read!

The full Lexis citation for Bethley is:
Indymac Bank, FSB v. Bethley, 9615/08, SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, KINGS COUNTY, 2009 NY Slip Op 50186U; 22 Misc. 3d 1119A; 880 N.Y.S.2d 873; 2009 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 225, February 6, 2009, Decided,  THIS OPINION IS UNCORRECTED AND WILL NOT BE PUBLISHED IN THE PRINTED OFFICIAL REPORTS PUBLISHED IN TABLE FORMAT IN THE NEW YORK SUPPLEMENT., Related proceeding at Onewest Bank, F.S.B. v. Drayton, 2010 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 5169 (N.Y. Sup. Ct., Oct. 21, 2010)
http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2009/2009_50186.htm
http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=8746731620660286571
The Google Scholar version of the decision has hyperlinks to other cited decisions.

Quote 0 0
William A. Roper, Jr.
Laura HESCOTT is expressly named in two other published New York decisions.  These include:
Deutsche Bank Trust Co. Ams. v. Peabody, 2007-2065, SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, SARATOGA COUNTY, 2008 NY Slip Op 51286U; 20 Misc. 3d 1108A; 866 N.Y.S.2d 91; 2008 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3690, June 26, 2008, Decided,  THIS OPINION IS UNCORRECTED AND WILL NOT BE PUBLISHED IN THE PRINTED OFFICIAL REPORTS.
http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2008/2008_51286.htm
[Mentioned within footnote 1.]

Indymac Bank, FSB v. Boyd, 4275/08, SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, KINGS COUNTY, 2009 NY Slip Op 50094U; 22 Misc. 3d 1112A; 880 N.Y.S.2d 224; 2009 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 109, January 22, 2009, Decided,  THIS OPINION IS UNCORRECTED AND WILL NOT BE PUBLISHED IN THE PRINTED OFFICIAL REPORTS. PUBLISHED IN TABLE FORMAT IN THE NEW YORK SUPPLEMENT., Related proceeding at Indymac Bank, FSB v. Bethley, 22 Misc. 3d 1119A, 880 N.Y.S.2d 873, 2009 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 225 (N.Y. Sup. Ct., Feb. 6, 2009)
http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2009/2009_50094.htm
http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=389456757898308369
Also note the evidentiary holding shown within footnote 1 in the Peabody case.
Quote 0 0
Write a reply...