Acesfull: "Would a civil foreclosure case that has been decided be available for public view?"
If you will follow the advice given by George Burns and the William A Roper thread mention in his post above to ur ? this is what can be achieved ~ hope this helps ..
BANK OF NEW YORK AS TRUSTEE FOR THE CERTIFICATE HOLDERS CWALT 2004 26T1, Plaintiff-Respondent,
SARAH G. LAKS and EDWARD EINHORN, her husband, Defendants-Appellants, and
PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, Defendant.
No. A-4221-09T3. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
On appeal defendants argue, as they did in the trial court, that the notice of intention was deficient for lack of plaintiff's name and address and that plaintiff did not prove by competent evidence that it had standing to sue.
We summarize our holdings. A notice of intention is deficient under N.J.S.A. 2A:50-56(c)(11) if it does not provide the name and address of the lender. A defendant who objects to inadequacy of the notice on that basis prior to entry of judgment is entitled to dismissal of the foreclosure complaint without prejudice.
Reversed and remanded for entry of an order vacating the judgment and dismissing the complaint without prejudice.
Note: This case info is “Posted by 4closureFraud on November 7, 2011”.
The case information quoted above was obtained from a case search of Google Scholar::