Mortgage Servicing Fraud
occurs post loan origination when mortgage servicers use false statements and book-keeping entries, fabricated assignments, forged signatures and utter counterfeit intangible Notes to take a homeowner's property and equity.
Articles |The FORUM |Law Library |Videos | Fraudsters & Co. |File Complaints |How they STEAL |Search MSFraud |Contact Us
If you have more transcripts, please post at this threat. Thanks

Subject: Full Depositions Transcripts of Foreclosure Mills Robot Signers

Robot Signors full depositions-  The Foreclosure Mills Robot Signers Fraud
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Quote 0 0
More transcript of Robot signers
Quote 0 0
Subject: MOTION TO ABATE FORECLOSURE PROCEEDINGS

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SIXTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR
PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA
HSBC BANK, USA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, CASE NO. 09-005190-CI-19 NOT IN ITS INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY, BUT SOLEY AS TRUSTEE ON BEHALF OF GSAA HOME EQUITY TRUST 2005-12
PLAINTIFF,
v.
KIMBERL Y BOLIN
DEFENDANT'S REQUEST FOR TAKING JUDICIAL NOTICE/OBJECTION TO
PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT/
MOTION TO ABATE FORECLOSURE PROCEEDINGS

COMES NOW, the Defendant KIMBERLY BOLIN, by and through undersigned counsel MATTHEW D. WEIDNER, and respectfully files this REQUEST FOR TAKING JUDICIAL NOTICE, OBJECTION TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, and MOTION TO ABATE PROCEEDINGS, in the above-titled civil action, and as grounds therefore states:
1. During the Summary Judgment hearing held on August 17, 2010 in this matter your undersigned counsel asserted that disputed questions of material fact existed in this case which precluded the entry of Summary Judgment. Your undersigned further asserted that this court should be aware of investigations into the practices of the law firms that are responsible for pursuing the majority of foreclosure cases on this court's docket by the Florida Attorney General and that this court should be aware of allegations made against one of those firms in two separate lawsuits that are pending in Federal Court for the Southern District of Florida. Your undersigned respectfully asserts that the existence of these investigations and lawsuits creates serious issues of material fact that should preclude this court from proceeding in any case where the firms
Matthew D. Weidner, PA
1229 Central Avenue· St. Petersburg Fl, 33705
727/894-3159
identified herein have appeared. Moreover, your undersigned feels he has a specific duty, as a member of the Bar, to make sure this court is aware of these issues generally because they potentially impact a significant number of cases pending on this court's docket and specifically with regard to this case because the nature of the alleged violations calls into question the veracity of the affidavits upon which Plaintiff relies in support of summary judgment in this case. The question presented by this motion is whether the existence of formal investigations by this state's chief law enforcement officer regarding the authenticity and veracity of documents submitted in this case and others should cause this court to have second thoughts about proceeding with this case and all ofthe other thousands of cases that are currently pending before this court.
2.
As this court is aware, judgments entered by any court which are the product of fraud are either void or voidable and the judgment may be attacked pursuant to Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, 1.540(b) for allegations of fraud (whether heretofore denominated intrinsic or extrinsic), misrepresentation, or other misconduct of an adverse party for up to one year after entry of that judgment.
3.
Moreover, judgments entered by this court when service ofprocess is improper may be challenged as void at any point in time and there is no limitations period to challenge such judgments. Shurman v. All. Mortgage & Inv. Corp., 795 So. 2d 952 (Fla. 2001); Shepheard v. Deutsche Bank Trust Co. Ams., 922 So.2d 340 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006); see also Redfield Inv.
A.V.V. v. Vill. Of Pinecret, 990 So.2d 1135 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008) Batchin v. Barnett Bank of Sw. Fla., 647 So.2d 211 (Fla. 2nd DCA 1994LM,L. Builders, IncLY. Reserve Developers, LLP, 769 So. 2d 1079 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000) (citing Ramagli Realty Co. v. Craver, 121 So.2d 648 (Fla. 1960). Given the profound implications of judgments that are void based on improper service
Matthew D. Weidner. PA
1229 Central Avenue· St. Petersburg Fl, 33705
727/894-3159
Quote 0 0
Subject: MOTION TO ABATE FORECLOSURE PROCEEDINGS

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SIXTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR
PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA
HSBC BANK, USA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, CASE NO. 09-005190-CI-19 NOT IN ITS INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY, BUT SOLEY AS TRUSTEE ON BEHALF OF GSAA HOME EQUITY TRUST 2005-12
PLAINTIFF,
v.
KIMBERL Y BOLIN
DEFENDANT'S REQUEST FOR TAKING JUDICIAL NOTICE/OBJECTION TO
PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT/
MOTION TO ABATE FORECLOSURE PROCEEDINGS

COMES NOW, the Defendant KIMBERLY BOLIN, by and through undersigned counsel MATTHEW D. WEIDNER, and respectfully files this REQUEST FOR TAKING JUDICIAL NOTICE, OBJECTION TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, and MOTION TO ABATE PROCEEDINGS, in the above-titled civil action, and as grounds therefore states:
1. During the Summary Judgment hearing held on August 17, 2010 in this matter your undersigned counsel asserted that disputed questions of material fact existed in this case which precluded the entry of Summary Judgment. Your undersigned further asserted that this court should be aware of investigations into the practices of the law firms that are responsible for pursuing the majority of foreclosure cases on this court's docket by the Florida Attorney General and that this court should be aware of allegations made against one of those firms in two separate lawsuits that are pending in Federal Court for the Southern District of Florida. Your undersigned respectfully asserts that the existence of these investigations and lawsuits creates serious issues of material fact that should preclude this court from proceeding in any case where the firms
Matthew D. Weidner, PA
1229 Central Avenue· St. Petersburg Fl, 33705
727/894-3159
identified herein have appeared. Moreover, your undersigned feels he has a specific duty, as a member of the Bar, to make sure this court is aware of these issues generally because they potentially impact a significant number of cases pending on this court's docket and specifically with regard to this case because the nature of the alleged violations calls into question the veracity of the affidavits upon which Plaintiff relies in support of summary judgment in this case. The question presented by this motion is whether the existence of formal investigations by this state's chief law enforcement officer regarding the authenticity and veracity of documents submitted in this case and others should cause this court to have second thoughts about proceeding with this case and all ofthe other thousands of cases that are currently pending before this court.
2.
As this court is aware, judgments entered by any court which are the product of fraud are either void or voidable and the judgment may be attacked pursuant to Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, 1.540(b) for allegations of fraud (whether heretofore denominated intrinsic or extrinsic), misrepresentation, or other misconduct of an adverse party for up to one year after entry of that judgment.
3.
Moreover, judgments entered by this court when service ofprocess is improper may be challenged as void at any point in time and there is no limitations period to challenge such judgments. Shurman v. All. Mortgage & Inv. Corp., 795 So. 2d 952 (Fla. 2001); Shepheard v. Deutsche Bank Trust Co. Ams., 922 So.2d 340 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006); see also Redfield Inv.
A.V.V. v. Vill. Of Pinecret, 990 So.2d 1135 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008) Batchin v. Barnett Bank of Sw. Fla., 647 So.2d 211 (Fla. 2nd DCA 1994LM,L. Builders, IncLY. Reserve Developers, LLP, 769 So. 2d 1079 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000) (citing Ramagli Realty Co. v. Craver, 121 So.2d 648 (Fla. 1960). Given the profound implications of judgments that are void based on improper service
Matthew D. Weidner. PA
1229 Central Avenue· St. Petersburg Fl, 33705
727/894-3159
Quote 0 0
anon

how about posting the faulty affadavits.

Quote 0 0
The Equitable One
Thank you for posting this resource Ann. the only one I don't already have is for Krystal Hall. However, when I click on the scribd link to obtain a copy of that I am informed that scribd is now requiring $ in order to access that document.
Quote 0 0
arkygirl
Here's a link to Krystal Hall depo and it allows for download:

http://4closurefraud.org/2010/03/30/full-deposition-of-krystal-hall-security-connections-inc-400-assignments-of-mortgage-a-day/



Quote 0 0
anon

if you upload a document you can have 24 hour access to download. (at least that was the way it was when I uploaded countrywide's affadavit).

Quote 0 0

I was not aware that they charge $5 for the download. I upload many documents and they never charge me for the download.  Sorry for the inconvenience. If you need other depositions, send me an e-mail, I'll send you a copy.

Quote 0 0
Write a reply...